|
1.
Generally
While the original Reliability Index Values and Averages
have their merits, one shortcoming is that they are assigned to pairs of model
years, rather than individual model years. This may mask a peculiarly bad
year. On the other hand, the Reliability Percentranks, Grades and Scores are
assigned to individual model years, but are still based on a model's
performance over a two-year vehicular age range, whenever possible. When a
Reliability Percentrank, Grade, or Score is based on data from only one year,
the background of the cell is softened by diagonal white lines. For a detailed
discussion of the methodology used to obtain Reliability Percentranks,
Grades, and Scores, check the Methodology
page.
An additional advantage of the Reliability Percentranks and
Grades is that they are quite independent, with an occasional exception, of
the vehicular age range, for age ranges 2-4 years, 3-5 years, 4-6 years,
5-7 years, and 6-8 years. This may be seen from Tables I-MV1993RP,
I-MV1993RGH, and I-MV1993RGE,
but may be seen from Tables I-MVRP, I-MVRGH, and I-MVRGE as well.
All, or nearly all, operations involved in generating the
Reliability Percentrank, Grade and Score tables have been double checked, or
checked more often when an error was found; however, no doubt errors persist.
Should any be found, please kindly advise.
2. Consumer
The consumer may use the Reliability Percentrank tables,
the Reliability Grade tables, and the Reliability Score tables to evaluate the
reliability of a used motor vehicle model or project the reliability of a new
motor vehicle model. In either case, one should always bear in mind that the
reliability of an individual vehicle may part from that of the model's
reliability, especially in instances of abuse or neglect.
The Reliability
Percentrank tables give the relative reliability of a model on a scale
from 0.00, the lowest value, to 1.00, the highest value. Table
I-MVRP gives the Reliability Percentranks of nearly all models sold in
North America (for exceptions, see the Methodology
page), by line and manufacturer, for model years 1988 to 1997, as well as
1988-1997 and 1993-1997 averages. In addition, there are separate tables for small
cars, sports cars,
sporty cars, coupes, family
cars, large cars, cars
marketed as upscale, cars marketed as luxury, sport
utility vehicles, minivans,
and pickups, which list
vehicles of the specified category in descending order of their Reliability
Percentranks, and (b) separate tables for the
best of 1988, the worst of 1988, the best
of 1989, the worst of 1989, the best of
1990, the worst of 1990, the best of
1991, the worst of 1991, the best of
1992, the worst of 1992, the best of
1993, the worst of 1993, the best of
1994, the worst of 1994, the best of
1995, the worst of 1995, the best of
1996, the worst of 1996, the best of
1997, the worst of 1997, the best of
1998, the worst of 1998, the best of
1999, the worst of 1999, the best of
2000, and the worst of 2000, which list vehicles in descending order of
their Reliability Percentranks for the specified year.
The tables giving the Reliability
Grades - High Standards may be useful for those consumers who may not be
desirous of owning the the most reliable, but are desirous of owning something
not too distant from the most reliable, and for those consumers whose goal is
one day to own something close to the most reliable. For the latter, these
tables may tell the consumer how far along he/she has come in obtaining that
goal.
The tables giving the Reliability
Grades - Exacting Standards may be of use to those consumers who want to
own only the best, at least with respect to reliability, or for those
consumers whose goal is one day to own the best, at least with respect to
reliability. For the latter, these tables may tell the consumer how far along
he/she has come in obtaining that goal.
Also, these percentrank and grade tables may be useful for
indexing the difference between the standards of workmanship and performance
that a consumer may hold and those that a prospective craftsman may hold. For
example, if it is necessary for a Toyota or Honda owner to employ a craftsman
who drives a Big Three engineered vehicle, it may be prudent to watch the
craftsman like a hawk to avoid disappointing results.
3. Manufacturer
A manufacturer interested in marketing a product to
consumers of higher, high, or exacting standards of workmanship and
performance may use the Reliability Percentrank and Grade tables, as
experience or business judgment directs, to index the standards of workmanship
and performance that may be expected of the (1) hourly employees, (2)
supervisors and managers, and (3) officers of a prospective supplier. Once a
percentrank or grade average has been found for each of the three groups,
weights may be ascribed in accordance with the manufacturer's experience, to
give a composite score.
4. Professional Craftsmen
A craftsman may use the tables for measuring the standards
of workmanship and performance of a prospective employer, in order to assess
how much attention need be paid detail.
5. Researchers
Researchers are invited to find correlations between a
person's social, psychological, and intellectual characteristics and the
Reliability Percentrank of the vehicle he/she drives. Some, of course, will
just be interesting, but others may be valuable in commerce, manufacturing, or
marketing.
|
|
Home or Site
Layout or
Site Map or Site Index or
Quick Jumps
